Bridge tournaments used to run smoothly. Boards were duplicated by people, and scores were hand-written on pickup slips.
Now it’s a circus! Boards are duplicated by machine, and scores are entered into electronic devices.Never in the history of bridge have there been more fouled boards and scoring errors.
Fortunately, what’s bad for bridge can be good for a bridge puzzle, at least when coupled with a warped mind.As a case in point, let’s follow Board 13 from the Open Pairs at the Key West Regional.
A finesser’s dream! Declarer wins the diamond cheaply and finesses seven more times to reach A-4 4 A-5 opposite A-5 A-4 4. Then he has the option to squeeze either opponent for a 13th trick; red aces squeeze West, or black aces squeeze East. The same finesses also allow 12 tricks in either major, but no 13th of course with a sure trump loser.
So what, you ask? Well, here’s the ‘identical’ board in Section B:
The East-West hands are the same, but North-South are entirely different, and this time ugly for declarer. Instead of four overtricks, 3 NT is now set two tricks with perfect defense: diamond lead ducked; heart finesse lost to East, then a spade shift and continuations ruin declarer’s communication. Major-suit games fare miserably as well, with 4 down three, and 4 down four.
I was in Section C, and my Board 13 had North-South rearranged again — and remarkably so, as the only makable game was four spades. Alas, I’ve lost the hand record! I wrote the ACBL for another copy, but they disavow any knowledge — not only of this event but in general. Perhaps you can help restore it. There were no void suits; I remember that.
Construct a South hand with which 3 NT and 4 fail but 4 makes.
Multiple solutions exist. Tiebreaking goals are for North-South to have the lowest freakness and for South to have the most HCP.
Before reading further, can you pick the winning South hand?
Quit
Congratulations to Dan Gheorghiu, who was first to submit the optimal solution. Dan is a brilliant solver with many past wins including The Case of the Four Aces, Third Best Blues, The Nonagon and Reese’s Pieces. Way back in 2011 he also won The Law of Total Trash under the pseudonym “Dan Dang,” which at the time I assumed was his real name, but now it all makes sense… Dang is he good!
Creating a layout where 3 NT and 4 both fail yet 4 makes is quite a task, with few solutions — but that’s what puzzles are made of. Below is one valid solution:
Four spades is made as shown. If West instead chooses to ruff at Trick 6, a diamond is pitched, and all variations lead to 10 tricks.
Three notrump is defeated with a diamond lead. If declarer next leads a heart to the jack, East wins and shifts to a spade. Declarer now cannot develop a ninth trick without the defense winning five. The same diamond lead also defeats 4 .
The optimal solution that follows was found only by Dan Gheorghiu and Konrad Majewski:
West would hardly lead the K in practice, but at double-dummy it’s the strongest start — and in fact necessary to beat 4 , although any spade is sufficient to beat 3 NT. Meanwhile, 4 cannot be stopped with any defense.
Dan Gheorghiu: Insanely hard puzzle!
The Donald: “Only six correct solutions” my ass! Even Hillary sent more than that, and I submitted 13,making four spades on every one of them. Simple play… trump a loser.
I would agree with an added comma. “Trump, a loser” is the correct form.
Professor Irwin Corey: The feasibility of this construction is an analytical catalyst whichexacerbates protocol over procedure to remain indigenous to its inception.
© 2021 PavCo Enterprises, Inc.where our business is none of yours
by Richard Pavlicek by Richard Pavlicek