Puzzle 8M07 Main |
| by Richard Pavlicek |
Come, Watson, come! The game is afoot.
Lestrade needs our help to build a case against a conniving perpetrator from across the pond.
To set the stage suppose you hold 5 K-Q-J-10-5-4 J-6-5-4 K-5.
I say, Holmes, a perfect hand! Twenty-nine points with the right jack, but way too many cards.
Not cribbage, you bumbling quack; bridge. North on your left opens a spade, which by foreign convention shows five, and South bids two notrump showing a balanced hand of 12 to 14 high-card points. Your side is vulnerable. What would you do?
Can I meld my heart sequence and four fives?
I think not. You know my methods, Watson. I would pass, because I have a promising lead and a vulnerable three-heart bid is dangerous. North raises to three notrump, which ends the auction. What would you lead?
Ah! Now I remember bridge! In my youth I penned a book on it, Play of the Hand. Let me fetch it
Here it is on Page 165: Fourth best
the ten of hearts!
Game afoot | ? | West | North | East | South | |
? | 1 | Pass | 2 NT | |||
? | Pass | 3 NT | Pass | Pass | ||
? | Pass | |||||
5 | Q J 10 9 6 | |||||
K Q J 10 5 4 | 6 | |||||
J 6 5 4 | K 9 3 | |||||
K 5 | 9 8 6 2 | |||||
? | ||||||
? | ||||||
Lestrade | ? | |||||
4 aces case | ? |
[Sigh] Close enough. According to Lestrade, the East-West players claimed that South played like he could see through the backs of the cards, spending four aces on the first four tricks, to win nine tricks against any defense. If we could fathom his line of play, it could be crucial evidence. This hotshot yankee declarer must be held accountable to the Crowns justice.
Im sorry, Holmes. I dont see any North-South cards.
Would it matter if you did? Never mind. Thats all the information Lestrade has. After filing charges, the East-West players mysteriously vanished, and the Yard fears the worst. South has lawyered up and wont speak to anyone, and North conveniently swears he remembers nothing. The court needs further evidence for a conviction. I cannot offer it my full attention because of the Moriarty kidnapping case, and youre obviously no help. Oh, wait! Ill get Pavlicek to put it on his web site.
Im always happy to assist Scotland Yard!
Construct a North-South layout consistent with the facts of the case.
The primary goal is to have the most aces (Tricks 1-4) won out of necessity (i.e., no other option will suffice). A secondary goal is to equalize the North and South rank sums (ace = 14, king = 13, queen = 12, jack = 11, ten = 10, etc.).
Congratulations to Dan Gheorghiu, British Columbia, who was the only solver to submit the maximal solution for necessity* and equalize the N-S totals. (Charles Blair got the hard part but was off a few points in the totals.) Dan is a new participant this year and hes been on a tear: eighth in February, fourth in March, third in April, and now first in May. Thats the good news! The bad news is that he may be out for June, having to testify for Scotland Yard.
*Maximum is 7, scored as follows: One point if winning the first trick is necessary. At tricks 2-4, one point if necessary to lead the chosen suit, and one point if necessary to play the ace. Also, the defense cannot deprive you of winning an ace by making an alternate play that doesnt gain. For example, if South leads a club and North has the ace, West will play the king unless playing low would gain a trick for the defense.
Rank | Name | Location | Necessity | North | South |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dan Gheorghiu | British Columbia | 7 | 104 | 104 |
2 | Charles Blair | Illinois | 7 | 102 | 106 |
3 | Julien Reichert | France | 5 | 104 | 104 |
4 | Nicholas Greer | England | 4 | 104 | 104 |
5 | Jamie Pearson | Ontario | 3 | 104 | 104 |
6 | Adam Dickinson | Scotland | 3 | 104 | 104 |
7 | Jon Greiman | Illinois | 3 | 104 | 104 |
8 | Grant Peacock | Maryland | 3 | 104 | 104 |
9 | Tim Broeken | Netherlands | 2 | 104 | 104 |
10 | Jacco Hop | Netherlands | 2 | 100 | 108 |
11 | Jim Munday | Mississippi | 1 | 104 | 104 |
12 | Christina Syrakopoulou | Greece | 1 | 93 | 115 |
Puzzle 8M07 Main | Top The Case of the Four Aces |
After winning the A, it is almost mandatory to keep West off lead, so the A should be in dummy behind Wests king. Further, theres no reason why South cant have five clubs in his required balanced hand. This leads to a straightforward solution:
3 NT South | K 8 7 4 3 | Trick | Lead | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | |
A 8 7 | 1. W | K | A | 6 | 2 | ||
10 7 2 | 2. N | 3 | 6 | A | 5 | ||
A 7 | 3. S | Q | K | A | 2 | ||
5 | Q J 10 9 6 | 4. N | 10 | K | A | 4 | |
K Q J 10 5 4 | 6 | Declarer succeeds easily | |||||
J 6 5 4 | K 9 3 | ||||||
K 5 | 9 8 6 2 | ||||||
A 2 | |||||||
9 3 2 | |||||||
A Q 8 | |||||||
Q J 10 4 3 |
Jon Grieman: [At Trick 2, lead a spade] to the ace; Q covered and won; 10 covered and won. Clubs are then established to provide a ninth trick with the Q entry. This might count as zero aces won out of necessity, though once each suit is led, ducking would certainly be hazardous to the contract.
Jon was pessimistic, as he scores 3 on my necessity scale. It was indeed necessary to win the A, A and A after starting the suit. Points were lost because Trick 1 could have been ducked, and a different suit could have been led at Tricks 2-4. The play, however, would certainly arouse suspicion with declarer grabbing the first trick as if he knew hearts were 6-1.
How con-veen-ient, said the Church Lady.
Our French connection took no chance of losing the first necessity point with this solution, as only a revoke could prevent winning Trick 1. The layout embraces most of the intended puzzle theme.
3 NT South | K 7 4 3 2 | Trick | Lead | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | |
A | 1. W | K | A | 6 | 2 | ||
10 8 7 | 2. N | 2 | 9 | A | 5 | ||
A J 7 4 | 3. S | A | 4 | 7 | 3 | ||
5 | Q J 10 9 6 | 4. S | Q | K | A | 2 | |
K Q J 10 5 4 | 6 | 5. N | 8 | K | 2 | 5 | |
J 6 5 4 | K 9 3 | Declarer succeeds w/endplay | |||||
K 5 | 9 8 6 2 | ||||||
A 8 | |||||||
9 8 7 3 2 | |||||||
A Q 2 | |||||||
Q 10 3 |
Julien Reicher: At Trick 2 a low spade must be led, and even if playing the six does not cost a trick, I will assume East splits to force the ace. After that, a high heart can still enable nine tricks; but the only other option is the A, then a high club (or the last spade first but its not what I want), covered by West (normal play) and necessarily won. Then a diamond from dummy kills East, giving me nine tricks (three clubs, two diamonds, one heart and three spades after a throw-in).
Juliens analysis is spot on, losing a point as noted for the optional high heart at Trick 3 and another for the optional spade at Trick 4. Still, 5 out of 7 necessity points topped all but two solvers. North and South totals are perfect at 104 each.
Holmes was too busy with the Moriarty case to solve this one, but the Commonwealth did. The Queen will be pleased that Canada came through on her behalf. On the following layout, winning the first trick and playing each suit including its ace through Trick 4 are absolutely essential to succeed 7 out of 7 necessity score and the North-South hands each total 104.
3 NT South | K 8 7 3 2 | Trick | Lead | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | |
A 7 | 1. W | K | A | 6 | 2 | ||
10 8 7 | 2. N | 8 | 9 | A | 5 | ||
A 7 4 | 3. S | A | 4 | 7 | 3 | ||
5 | Q J 10 9 6 | 4. S | Q | K | A | 2 | |
K Q J 10 5 4 | 6 | 5. N | 8 | K | 2 | 5 | |
J 6 5 4 | K 9 3 | 6. E | 9 | Q | 6 | 10 | |
K 5 | 9 8 6 2 | 7. S | J | 5 | 4 | 6 | |
A 4 | 8. S | 10 | 4 | 7 | 8 | ||
9 8 3 2 | 9. S | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | ||
A Q 2 | 10. E | Q | 4 | 10 | 2 | ||
Q J 10 3 | 11. E | J | 3 | J | 3 | ||
East is endplayed |
Dan Gheorghiu: There are eight top tricks, and spades, diamonds or clubs could provide a ninth. Trick 3 is critical for the defense: If East follows with a low diamond, a diamond is led at Trick 5 toward the queen, then East is eventually endplayed with the fourth club to take two spade tricks (ducked) then North scores the 7. If East instead unblocks the K (preserving an entry to partners jack), declarer cashes his clubs and K, then exits with a heart to endplay West [assuming he keeps J-x] to win the last two tricks in diamonds. If the court would call on me, I will do my civic duty to testify against South.
Dans evidence looks pretty damning, so that rogue South player should pay for his evildoings. Pack your bags, Dan! Lestrade has booked you first class but dont head for the airport itll be rail to New York, then RMS Mauretania to London. Bon voyage!
This puzzle was inspired by an old double-dummy problem, Ace Grabber.
Charles Blair: wherever else that red herring [ 7] led your pack. -The Adventure of the Priory School
Wouldnt that be a black herring? Charles alludes to Easts curious 9-8-6-2, which suggests a solution of Q-J-10-7 opp. A-4-3, allowing four club winners (shades of last months Fail Safe). I wish I could claim such deviousness, but I went for symmetry not subterfuge. In case nobody noticed, the E-W spot cards were chosen to equalize their rank sums (104 each).
Meanwhile, back at the Yard
Inspector Lestrade: You know, Holmes? In another life youd have made an excellent criminal.
Sherlock Holmes: Yes. And you, sir, an excellent policeman.
Puzzle 8M07 Main | Top The Case of the Four Aces |
Acknowledgments to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930)
© 2015 Richard Pavlicek