Scores 7V31  MainChallenge


April 2001 Scores


Analyses by Richard Pavlicek

The “When the Bluebird Sings” play contest had 226 participants, and everyone scoring above average is listed here. Ties in the rankings are broken by the date and time of submission (earliest wins).

Top 5051Location RankingBot’s Eye View

Participation Stats
Number of participants226
Number of locations75
Highest score59
Median score38
Lowest score21
Average score39.07

Top 50 Places

RankScoreLCName123456
159RORadu MihaiDADAEB
259USwaN. Scott CardellDADAEB
357HRTonci TomicDDDADB
456UKenGareth BirdsallDDDAEB
556UStxHerbert WiltonDDBADB
656USmaJonathan WeinsteinDDDAEB
755USflPaul KubiakCABAEB
855RUAlex PerlinDDBAEB
955USwaHenry LortzBADADF
1055CIBernard PascalDDBAEB
1154USnyFranco BaseggioBDBAEB
1252UScaGrant PeacockCDBAEB
1352USilCharles BlairFDDADB
1452HKWalter LeeDDDDDB
1551FRFrancois DellacherieFDDAEB
1651PTManuel PauloBDDABB
1751INVenkatesh RamaratnamBDBAEE
1850INShyam SashitalBAEAEF
1950USwvNeil CohenCDDADF
2050HKSimon CheungDBEAAB
2150USnjRon SmallDDBEDE
2249USnyBarry RigalBBDDDE
2349UKenJohn ReardonFBDAEE
2449USilGeorge KlemicCDDAEF
2549ZWLeif-Erik StabellCABAAE
2649USJane EasonDDBCDE
2749HRMiro TeslaEDBAEB
2849INArvind SrinivasanDBEDDB
2948AUBill JacobsFDDADF
3048INSivakumar SalemBDDCEE
3148INNeelotpal SahaiBDAAEB
3248FRMukesh ChandakBBCAAC
3348SEBjorn AhlmBDEAEE
3448UKenNeil MorgensternDDEABB
3548USmiJohn HarrisFBDADD
3648INGowniyan VaideeshwarBDDCEE
3748BEBernard DanloyDDDABF
3848USpaSteve WhiteDDBDEC
3948LVMartins EgleFDDAEE
4047FRJacques NormandBDDEED
4147AUBill PowellCDBAED
4247HKHongyan ChenADDADE
4346BESebastien LouveauxBBCCEE
4446CHOlivier La SpadaCDCAEF
4546CNWeidong YangCDDEEF
4646IDAdjat AbdurodjakFBDAAE
4746USnjJames ConnellADDAEE
4845ILRachel PelledBDEEEE
4945USflMabel PavlicekEDDAED
5044NLRosalind HengeveldFDEAAB

Scores 7V31 MainChallengeAnalysesTop April 2001 Scores

All Others Above Average

RankScoreLCName123456
5144SERobert LarssonFEBADE
5244USnjLeonard HelfgottDDEACE
5344NLBart TrakselFDEEEB
5444NLTjeerd KootstraCBEADA
5544UScaPhil ClaytonFDEADF
5644INArvind RanasariaBDDFED
5744TRUfuk CotukFBBAEA
5844SEAndreas WesterlundADDACB
5944USflDick BurgoonFAEEAB
6044AUSartaj HansEDEEDB
6144ITGiovanni MacchiaFAEEAB
6244DERainer HerrmannFDDDDE
6344UScaRobert DannelsCCDEEE
6443TRBerk BasaranFBDCED
6543CAonGabriel Nita-SagunaFDDDEE
6643UScaRoger GabrielsonADEEDB
6743ZAGeorge RahrEDDAAF
6842DEUlrich VoigtCFDEEE
6942USilJames HudsonCDDDAE
7042CNRu ShangguanBBEDED
7142INKaizad AnklesariaCDBFDD
7242NOThomas HauklandFFDEDC
7342INArvind NimbalkerFBEEDF
7442NOJan LangoyDCEEDD
7542USohCraig BiddleCCDDDF
7642USmdRichard MucciFAECDD
7742LCBob TobiasDDDCCD
7842ROFlorin ConstantinFBDACD
7942USvaMark DahlFDBDEE
8042USazThomas HanfordADDCEE
8141CAonVinay SarinADCEDE
8241USvaLarry KahnFDCDDE
8341FRPatrick FlodropsADBDDE
8441HKHenry WongCDDBBB
8541CLConstantino SifaquiFCDCDF
8641SETorbjorn AxelssonFDDAFE
8741NLBen Ter HorstFBDCAF
8841NOTruls IngebrigtsenAEDABB
8941CAonMihai ValcuFDCDDE
9040INPriya Ranjan SinhaBDECBE
9140CAabDick YuenACDEAB
9240IDDidik KoesbiantoACDEEE
9340USmoJohn NevinFCCDEB
9440USgaLarry RivkinFDEEDD
9540UKniRobin BurnsCCDCAE
9640USmaK. Scott KimballBCFEDF
9740UKenAnthony GoldingEBEDDE
9840TRHasan GedikEBDDAE
9940IEColin SmithEDEEAB
10040UScaAnne BellECEAEE

Names with accented or non-English letters have been converted to an English representation with a 26-letter alphabet. Many people use erratic capitalization, so I determine proper case by algorithm; if this does not correctly display your name, please advise and I will add it to the exception list. If you wish to contact someone whose name you see listed (such as a lost friend) give me permission to send your address to that person, then he or she can contact you. I will not give out e-mail addresses (these are private and go nowhere from me).

Scores 7V31 MainChallengeAnalysesTop April 2001 Scores

Location Ranking

This table lists all the participating locations, ranked by the average score of their entries. The “Best” column shows the best finish (by rank) of any player in that location. Locations with less than five entries are ineligible for the top ranking and grouped separately.

RankAverageBestLCLocationEntries
145.6014HKHong Kong5
245.2015FRFrance5
342.2917INIndia14
441.894UKenEngland9
541.6750NLNetherlands6
641.3311USnyNew York6
739.4072NONorway5
838.6729AUAustralia6
938.257USflFlorida8
1037.4033SESweden10
1137.3812UScaCalifornia13
1236.8067ZASouth Africa5
1334.33102SISlovenia6
1433.8076USmdMaryland5
1533.3065CAonOntario10

RankAverageBestLCLocationEntries
1655.008RURussia1
1753.003HRCroatia2
1851.0016PTPortugal1
1950.0019USwvWest Virginia1
2049.672USwaWashington3
2149.0025ZWZimbabwe1
2248.0035USmiMichigan1
2348.0038USpaPennsylvania1
2448.0039LVLatvia1
2547.6713USilIllinois3
2647.0037BEBelgium2
2746.0044CHSwitzerland1
2844.676USmaMassachusetts3
2944.5010CICote d’Ivoire2
3044.0045CNChina2
3143.2521USnjNew Jersey4
3242.501RORomania4
3342.0077LCCocos Islands1
3441.0085CLChile1
3540.5057TRTurkey4
3640.0026USUnited States2
3740.0048ILIsrael3
3840.0095UKniNorthern Ireland1
3939.5062DEGermany4
4039.2546IDIndonesia4
4139.0093USmoMissouri2
4238.5079USvaVirginia4
4338.5094USgaGeorgia2
4438.00121ARArgentina1
4538.00122UKwaWales1
4637.755UStxTexas4
4737.6775USohOhio3
4837.3361ITItaly3
4937.0080USazArizona4
5037.00117ESSpain2
5137.00131USmnMinnesota1
5237.00133RSSerbia1
5336.6791CAabAlberta3
5436.00136TWTaiwan1
5536.00147DKDenmark1
5635.00152USakAlaska1
5735.00155JPJapan1
5835.00160GRGreece1
5934.00162CAbcBritish Columbia2
6034.00165EGEgypt1
6134.00171EEEstonia1
6233.5099IEIreland2
6333.00174USalAlabama1
6433.00176CAmbManitoba1
6533.00178CApqQuebec1
6632.00188BGBulgaria1
6732.00189UYUruguay1
6830.50195NZNew Zealand2
6929.50142USncNorth Carolina4
7029.00209CAnsNova Scotia1
7128.50149UKscScotland2
7228.00213USnhNew Hampshire1
7327.00217USctConnecticut1
7426.00220USinIndiana1
7524.00223USscSouth Carolina1

Scores 7V31 MainChallengeAnalysesTop April 2001 Scores

Bot’s Eye View

Bots Revolt Against Bluebirds!

I tried to pose these problems to some of the popular computer bridge programs, but the multiple-play content of most of the options (A-F) made it impractical. In most cases the lines of play chosen by the bots were actually “none of the above,” which is not exactly startling news when you consider that computer bridge play is rather primitive. I considered the possibility of going with the nearest match, but it soon became apparent that the differences were too significant to be categorized fairly in this way.

Therefore, the bots will take a spring break. Next month they should be well rested to take on my next bidding poll.

Scores 7V31 MainChallengeAnalysesTop April 2001 Scores

© 2001 Richard Pavlicek