Column 7B15 (7-29-84) by Richard Pavlicek


4
by South
E-W Vul![]() | A Q 6 4 3 10 8 J 9 K J 9 3 | |
J 10 7 J 5 Q 10 7 5 3 8 7 5 | ![]() | K 9 8 9 4 2 K 8 6 A Q 6 2 |
Lead: 5 | 5 2 A K Q 7 6 3 A 4 2 10 4 |
| West Pass Pass All Pass | North 1 ![]() 3 ![]() | East Pass Pass | South 1 ![]() 2 ![]() 4 ![]() |
West led the diamond five to the nine, king, and ace; and declarer considered his best move. Unfortunately, he should have made this consideration one trick earlier; for now the contract was unmakable.
South finally led the club 10 to Easts queen, and a diamond was returned to Wests queen. West then shifted to the spade jack to scuttle the contract. There was no way to avoid the loss of four tricks (one diamond, two clubs, and one spade).
Lets go back to that first trick. Declarer should have held up his diamond ace, allowing Easts king to win. If East returns a diamond, South wins the ace, ruffs his last diamond in dummy, and draws trumps in three rounds. The club 10 is then led and the contract is assured, regardless of the location of the club and spade honors.
If East instead returns a trump at trick two, South wins and immediately attacks clubs then if East leads another trump, South draws trumps and leads his last club to establish two club winners in dummy.
Exactly what did the holdup play accomplish? As usual, it broke up the opponents communication; and, specifically, it prevented West from gaining the lead to attack spades.

Copyright © 1984 Richard Pavlicek. All rights reserved.