Column 7B07 Main


Slim Chance Better Than None


 by Richard Pavlicek

Today’s deal occurred in a local duplicate tournament. The North-South assets do not warrant reaching game, but a few pairs nonetheless wandered into four hearts. The temptation to overbid is a disease that afflicts most bridge players (this writer included) from time to time.

The optimistic bidding at one table is shown below. North was clearly the more guilty — a simple preference to two hearts at his second turn would have been wiser; and his final jump to four hearts was a wild gamble.

South dealsS Q J 9 8 6 5WestNorthEastSouth
None vulH J 4 31 H
D K 8 2Pass1 SPass2 C
C 3Pass2 SPass3 C
S 10 4 3TableS A K 7Pass4 HAll Pass
H A 5 2H 8 7
D A J 7 4D 10 9 6 5
C Q 8 2C J 10 9 7
S 2
H K Q 10 9 6
D Q 3
4 H SouthC A K 6 5 4

West made the excellent lead of a low heart in an effort to cut down the dummy’s ruffing power. After winning the heart nine, our South player embarked on an inferior line of play: club ace; club king; club ruff. Stranded in dummy, there was no way to reach the South hand to ruff another club so the contract had to fail.

A clever declarer could have made this hand with proper play, albeit due to a friendly lie of the cards. At trick two a spade should be led to dummy’s eight and East’s king. This leaves the defenders in a predicament. If trumps are cleared, declarer can win the third round in dummy and lead the spade queen for a ruffing finesse; then the diamond king provides an entry to the established spades. If trumps are not led, declarer can also succeed with careful play — leading first to the diamond king; ruffing spade finesse; then crossruffing (or establishing the spades if West wins the diamond ace to lead trumps).

The story contains a moral. When your partner’s overbid (not yours, of course) puts you in a treacherous contract, look for a lie of the enemy cards that will allow you to succeed. Then play on that assumption.

Column 7B07 MainTop Slim Chance Better Than None

© 1984 Richard Pavlicek